ALL OF THEM ARE TO BLAME

I glanced through the guest opinion article penned by former Deputy Director Wendy Noble inside the NSA, for today's Washington Post. She doesn't write anything substantive or overtly political, other than espousing broad support for her former colleagues from that world.

Meanwhile, some ex-CIA official named Adam Zarnowski who is actually putting his ass on the front line (and isn't worried about violating the Hatch Act in his former capacity serving this country as a CIA officer) recently wrote his own article about Florida and the 2024 presidential election. Now, Zarnowski is somebody remarkable and he is also rather intelligent. I think in real life that Zarnowski may not be too different from former NSA Deputy Director Wendy Noble. After departing his job in helping stop the worldwide trafficking of humans at the CIA over personal reasons, Zarnowski decided to go a step further to expose the dirty deeds that helped get Donald J. Trump into office for a second term.

Zarnowski is helping expose the cynical nexus of vote stealing between the ultra-billionaire Elon Musk, the right-wing judicial activist and influencer Leonard Leo (who is single-handedly responsible for picking several of Trump's incompetent SCOTUS Justices which were nominated by US Congress to serve on the highest court), the software voting machine company called ES&S, and the libertarian California billionaire named Peter Thiel, who himself has many shitty personal and political beliefs.

These are not inconsequential actions. What Zarnowski is doing in his latest article is looking at only one state and comparing different numbers entered into the official vote record — over time.

Can anyone else corroborate the Florida miscount? I have not yet found any significant data errors in all the months that I've been reading and following Zarnowski's posts, specifically with regard to what he has been researching and publishing through Substack. All of the data Zarnowski uses is, of course, public data.

In 2025, The Atlantic's David A. Graham picked apart Adam Zarnowski's reported data which claimed that Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris likely won the 2024 election. The problem with Graham's assertions is that his rebuke of Zarnowski was more cursory than anything measurable. The Atlantic's author did not drill down on querying specific data sets or points of logic used by Zarnowski when the ex-CIA official questioned the real outcome of the 2024 election in the swing states in his carefully written Substack articles.

Adam Zarnowski has claimed that someone both important and in charge authorized several small patches or software change to the Pro V&V software systems that all data-capable ES&S voting machines use which adversely affected the vote totals in swing states during the 2024 election. The vote totals from all of the swing states had a central role in handing Trump his presidential title again during November 2024 without qualification. US Congress should not have certified Trump's 2024 win on this basis alone, but we all know that the GOP side of Congress is full of chickenshits and insurrectionists. That's not lost on me of course. US Congress is pretty weak as an institution, today.

I think that Zarnowski is basically right. The software was preemptively triggered so that it would not execute (or work) in some way. Voting machines in every US state affected by this troubled software code were able to allow their software weakness to run unabated. Somehow while this was going on, the vote numbers were padded or stuffed with fake online ballot submissions which swayed the election in Donald J. Trump's favor.

I'm not here to debate the validity of what Adam Zarnowski wrote about on Substack. As a civilized society, we are way past that point of no return. Donald J. Trump is not worth defending in any shape, form, or manner. Trump is worth around $5 billion dollars or so. The conflicts of interest are clear and pretty stark to me.

Link: